| Untitled Document Does the Glycemic Index Lead to the Land of the Lean? By Suzanne W. Dixon, MPH, MS, RD It seems that every time you turn around, you hear about the glycemic index (GI). “You Can Turbo-Charge Your Metabolism, Create Life Long Motivation & Lose Up to 19 Pounds Of Fat In Just 21 Days Or Less – Guaranteed…!” touts a GI-based weight loss program sold online. “This is the only diet concept that results in MASSIVE weight loss…” continues the hard-sell. Could it really be that simple? Is it possible that by incorporating this idea into your eating habits, you can forever shed your pounds and end your weight battles? Unlikely. After all, if it were that easy, wouldn’t everyone be doing this? By the Numbers The glycemic index (GI) provides a way of ranking carbohydrates according to their effect on our blood sugar level. The higher the number the more quickly a carbohydrate will raise blood sugar. GI tells us how quickly 50 grams of carbohydrate from a specific food will turn into blood sugar in the body, as compared to a reference food – typically white bread or white table sugar. The reference food is assigned a value of 100. A GI below 100 indicates carbohydrates from that food are absorbed more slowly than carbohydrate from white bread or sugar. Carbohydrates from foods that have a GI above 100 are absorbed more quickly than white bread or sugar carbs. What’s Glycemic Load? Although most people are not familiar with glycemic load (GL), this measure actually is more useful than GI. GL takes into account the GI of a food and to this it adds an adjustment for how many carbohydrates are in a normal serving size. To see why GL is more useful than GI, we can compare carrots and white pasta. The GI of carrots is 131, while pasta has a GI of 71 (1). Based on these numbers, we conclude that carrots are an “unhealthy”, high-GI food. We are incorrectly led to believe that carrots are worse for our health, and our waistlines, than a big bowl of pasta. However, one large carrot (a serving) contains just 4 grams of carbohydrate ... and a low, healthy glycemic load of 5.2. One serving of pasta, about a cup cooked, provides 40 grams of carbohydrate. The glycemic load for a serving of pasta is quite high at 28 1. In order to have the same glycemic load from carrots, you'd have to eat nearly two pounds of them! This shows how glycemic index can be misleading. The bottom line is that a high GI food, when eaten in a normal serving size, is not necessarily going to derail our weight loss efforts or ruin our health. Ditching the GI, Improving Our Eating Habits One positive result about the attention to glycemic index is that it has raised our awareness of the quality of carbohydrates. GI is a less-than-perfect measure of carbohydrate quality, but it gets us thinking about which carbs really are the better choice. Remember this tip for making healthier carb choices: three things – protein, fat, and fiber – slow the absorption and conversion of carbohydrate from food into glucose in our blood stream. That’s right. Simply combining the carbohydrates you do eat with fiber, lean protein, and/or healthy fat brings both the GI and the GL of the total snack or meal down to a healthy level. The Practicalities You can picture how this works by considering fruit and fruit juice. The GI and GL of whole fruit are much lower than fruit juice, because the fiber in the whole food slows the absorption of the carbs. Consider snacking on a piece of fruit and a handful of nuts, which provide all three – protein, healthy fat, and fiber! Or try a snack of carrots and hummus or bean dip – again, a stealthy, healthy way to keep the GI and GL low. Make sure every meal includes a lean protein, such as beans, wild-caught fish, organic chicken, tofu, tempeh, or grass-fed, lean beef. The options are endless, but the key is to keep your eye on the prize: by combining protein, fat, and/or fiber into every meal and snack, you will better regulate your appetite, keep your blood sugar and insulin levels steady, and aid your weight management efforts. We’ve all been hoping for the proverbial “free lunch” – easy weight management and good health while eating whatever suits our fancy. Unfortunately, nature doesn’t work that way. But lucky for us, nature does provide the perfect nourishment in the form of healthy, whole, minimally processed foods. Your Take Home Message In general, carbohydrates that look much like they did when coming from the branch, off the vine, or out of the ground are the best choices. You don’t need a label to tell you that apples, carrots, broccoli, or plain oatmeal are healthy choices. The funny thing is, we’ve probably known this all along. References - Willett, W. Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating. Simon & Schuster. 2001.
The easy way to sneak in extra antioxidants Five times the antioxidant power of fresh apples! For years, this nutritional powerhouse has been treated like an unwanted byproduct … until now! Groundbreaking research performed at Cornell University and perfected by AppleBoost revealed how to unlock the amazing antioxidant, anti-aging properties of apple peel. Our patented drying process concentrates the nutrients even more! Don't get the recommended 8 to 10 servings of fruits and veggies per day? Want to boost the nutrient content of every bite you eat? Try this amazingly versatile whole food concentrate! Click here now! Two ways to lower your risk of metabolic syndrome By Eileen Coale Many people have never heard of metabolic syndrome, also known as Syndrome X, but it's a big health problem … literally! Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of health conditions associated with obesity. These conditions include high levels of belly fat, high blood pressure, elevated blood sugar levels, and unhealthy cholesterol profiles. People with metabolic syndrome have a higher risk of diabetes, heart disease, and some cancers. The problem affects one out of every five Americans. Now, two different studies show that certain nutrients may help slash the risk of metabolic syndrome. The first study was published in the May 2009 issue of the Journal of Nutrition. Researchers found that people who had a high intake of carotene-rich foods had a 58 percent lower incidence of metabolic syndrome. Carotenes are naturally occurring nutrients found in brightly colored vegetables and fruits. Of six carotenes commonly found in the diet, beta-carotene and lycopene had the most beneficial effect. People who reported eating the most of these 2 carotenes had the lowest risk of metabolic syndrome. Beta-carotene is found in large amounts in sweet potatoes and carrots. Lycopene is found in tomatoes, especially in cooked tomatoes. It's also found in pink grapefruit and watermelon. Kale is a surprisingly good source of beta carotene, as well as two other important carotenes, lutein and zeaxanthin. Another study published in Diabetes Care revealed a link between Vitamin D deficiency and metabolic syndrome. The study involved 3262 Chinese people between the ages of 50 and 70. Nearly everyone, fully 94 percent of study participants, was Vitamin D deficient. Almost half (42%) of those with vitamin D deficiency also had metabolic syndrome, leading the study authors to conclude that vitamin D deficiency increased the risk of metabolic syndrome in this group. In other studies, low Vitamin D levels also have been associated with insulin resistance. There's a growing consensus that the current recommended daily allowance of Vitamin D (400 IU) is set too low for good health for most people. Although some foods are rich in Vitamin D – such as eggs, wild salmon, and cod – it's difficult to get enough Vitamin D from food alone. The best source of Vitamin D is the midday sunlight, but it's not a viable option for everyone. For those who live in the north, seldom spend time outdoors, burn easily, or have concerns about skin cancer risk, Vitamin D supplements may be the best choice. References: Journal of Nutrition, "Dietary Carotenoid Intake is Associated WIth Lower Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged and Elderly Men," Volume 139, Number 5, May 2009. Authors: I. Sluijs, J.W.J. Beulens, D.E. Grobbee,Y.T. van der Schouw Diabetes Care, "Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D Concentration and Metabolic Syndrome Among Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese." Authors: L. Lu, A. Pan, F.B. Hu, O.H. Franco, H. Li, X. Li, X. Yang, Y. Chen, Z. Yu, X. Lin Studies reveal amazing benefits of apple peel… Apples have legendary health and nutrition benefits … and recent groundbreaking studies reveal that many of the beneficial nutrients are concentrated in the peel. Apple peel is packed with powerful antioxidants and other nutrients – up to six times more than in apple flesh! When it's dried and powdered, apple peel is near the top of the chart in antioxidant power. Dried apple peel capsules make "an apple a day" easier than ever! The only encapsulated organic apple peel powder made using the patented chemical-free drying process pioneered by Cornell University. Click here to learn more. Haven't we been saying that all along? By Eileen Coale A newly published study in the Journal of Food Quality confirms what we at AppleBoost have known all along. The study shows that dried apple peel powder (DAPP) is a healthy alternative to flour in baked goods. Up to one fourth of a recipe's wheat flour can be replaced with DAPP without affecting the taste or texture. The study also confirmed apple peel's high levels of antioxidant activity. An added benefit is the powder's 41 percent fiber content. Researchers believe that DAPP will have many applications as a healthy ingredient in prepared foods and baked goods. In 2008, AppleBoost Products began offering applesauce with DAPP. In 2009, the company will introduce more products containing DAPP. AppleBoost Products is the only company to make dried apple peel powder available directly to the consumer. For recipes that incorporate the powder, click here: http://www.appleboost.com/pages.php?pID=15. Reference: Journal of Food Quality, "Baking and Sensory Characteristics of Muffins Incorporated with Apple Skin Powder," Volume 32, Issue 6. Authors: H.P. Vasantha Rupasinghe, Laixin Wang, Nancy L. Pitts, T. Astatkie |